Frustration
of Contract: An Illustrative Guide – A Free Research Paper
Prof. Dr. R. B. Crawford
© 2007 - 2015
'Frustration
of contract' is possibly one of the least understood aspects of UK Employment
Law, and has been misinterpreted by some Employment Tribunals. The first clarification
of 'frustration of contract' is that it does not constitute dismissal (see e.g.
Pitt, 1994). Before assuming frustration of contract, one needs to make an
assessment of the situation based on the facts that are relevant to the
situation. Your decision or assumption, in this regard, might be aided by the
illustrative cases, below.
A simple but realistic
definition of ‘frustration of contract’ might be:
A situation that occurs in the ‘employer-employee relationship’ that
mitigates against the effective continuance of this relationship, when neither
the employer nor employee is at fault.
In
this case, the termination or cessation of paid employment has not been the
intention of the employer or employee. Lewis (1997) aptly regards frustration
of contract as 'automatic termination'. Under normal circumstances, the
employer would be willing to continue to provide the employee with remunerative
tasks or assignment and the employee is willing but unable to work effectively.
However, without closer examination, there appears to be a stalemate
between the employer and the employee, each perceiving to have a case against
the other. However, in reality, none does. Because a number of cases of
frustration of contract results from illness, some employers attempt to
disguise disability discrimination as frustration of contract. If an employee
is ill, then a test of whether frustration of contract might be:
The possibility of the
employee's full recovery;
The possibility of his or
her being redeployed; or
Whether the situation can be
resolved if the employer makes reasonable adjustment to the work or work
station - as a means of supporting the worker's effective role performance.
This is a provision entrenched in the Disability Discrimination Act 1995.
As
case #8 (to be added shortly) will illustrate, in the event of illness the
employee is entitled to remain certified ill until his or her sick leave
entitlement has been fully utilised. Therefore, frustration of contract cannot
be assumed until after that period. Please note, however, that sick pay
entitlement differs from one organisation to another but in most large
organisation the entitlement is usually six months on full pay and 6 month at
half pay. It should also be noted that employees are only entitled to statutory
sick pay, unless the organisation is contractually obliged to pay it or had
intended to do so, by virtue of previous or current practice. There are a
number of old and recent cases to illustrate these two points.
However,
there are reasons other than illness that might result in the frustration of
contract. These include:
Confinement or 'isolation'.
These are exemplified by the employee being confined to prison, or as the
saying goes, 'At Her Majesty's Pleasure' (see cases 5 & 6). The worker
might also be stranded or 'marooned' by acts of nature, war or civil unrest.
Displacement through
relocation or the cessation of 'work activities'. If an organisation is forced
to relocate, in which case this is not a choice but an act of survival, and an
employee is willing but unable to continue to work, from the new location, then
frustration of contract occurs. However, there are contractual problems if
there was a stipulation of the physical location of the job. Rover found this a
problem, part of the reason that resulted in its demise (in its previous life).
Workers had contracts that specifically stated the location of their place of
work. It meant that some workers were passing plants that were understaffed
going to factories that had excess employees. While a student member of the HR
team worked on a 'Postcode Redeployment Strategy', with a lucrative relocation
incentive, the company slipped closer to receivership.
As a
later case (to be added shortly) illustrates, an employee might have a valid
employment contract but there is cessation of work at his or her posting. He or
she is still willing to work but the employer is unable to redeploy him or her.
This represents a clear case of frustration of contract but had been missed by
the Employment Tribunal
Case 1
The
Issue of ‘frustration of contract’ is not new in legal terms. In fact, Lockton
(`2003) and Pitt (1994) date it as far back as 1876, in the case of Pousard
v. Spiers & Pond. Poussart In this instance, Pousard, an opera singer,
sued the employer for breach of contract having been replaced because of
illness. Although the illness lasted for less than the one month’s duration of
the performance, the only possible replacement would only agree to take the
part if for its entire duration. The court ruled that the contract had been
frustrated.
Case
2
Hart,
in the case of Hart v. Marshall & Sons (Bulwell) Training Institute
[1977] (Lockton, 2003), was a night service fitter but was ill for 20
months. He was replaced, despite sending his employer regular sick note. The
Employment Appeals Tribunal ruled that because he was a key worker, his
employment had been frustrated by illness.
Case
3
In Hebden
v. Forsey & Sons [1973], (Lockton, 2003), Hebden, one of two sawyers,
had been away from work for almost two years. He sent his employer regular sick
note and his employer agreed that he would not be able to work effectively
until he had fully recovered. He was, nevertheless, replaced. The Employment
Tribunal held that the contract had not been frustrated.
Case
4
In Maxwell
v. Walter Howard Designs Training Institute (Selwyn, 1991), Maxwell, a
cabinet maker, was away from work for almost 2 years, sending regular sick
notes to his employer. He was still replaced. The Tribunal ruled that the
nature of his employment was of such that he did not have to be replaced
permanently. Therefore frustration of contract did not occur.
Case
5
In the
case of Hare v Murphy Bros Training Institute (1974), there was
uncertainty over why the contract of employment had been terminated. While
Stephenson held that the employment was frustrated by imprisonment, Stephenson
stated only that imprisonment ended the contract (Duddington, 2003).
Case
6
In Shepherd
and Co. Training Institute. v Jerrom (1986), the Court of Appeal clarified
that frustration of contract can be assumed, where an employee is imprisoned
(Duddington, 2003).
HRODC Postgraduate Training Institute
A Postgraduate Training
Institute, based in United Kingdom, with International Operation, HRODC
Postgraduate Training Institute is registered with the UK Register of
Learning Providers (UKRLP), of
the Department
for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS),
formerly Department
for Innovation, Universities and Skills (DIUS). Its Registration Number is: 10019585 and can it be Verified at: http://www.ukrlp.co.uk/.
It has been engaged in Postgraduate
Training and Consultancy since 1996. Our Institute offers over 800 Diploma – Postgraduate – Short Courses, and 57 Postgraduate Diploma Programmes.
1.
Our
websites are:
2.
We
admit full-time students and delegates (short course participants) with academic
qualifications ranging from Undergraduate Degrees to PhDs;
3.
Classroom-based
Diploma – Postgraduate Short Courses are of a minimum of 5 days (30
Credit-Hours);
4.
The
equivalent Video-Enhanced On-Line (Video-Enabled Face-to-Face) delivery for a
5-day course is 10 days, based on 3 hours per day;
5.
Intensive
Full-Time {5 days (30 hours) per week direct lecturer-contact} Postgraduate
Diploma Programmes last 3 months (360 Credit-Hours);
6.
Full-Time
(15 hours direct lecturer-contact) Postgraduate Diploma Programmes are of 6
months’ duration (360 Credit-Hours);
7.
Video-Enhanced
On-Line Postgraduate Diploma Programmes (360 Credit-Hours) last 20 weeks. This
delivery is based on direct lecturer contact for 3 hours per day, 6 days per
week (http://www.hrodc-business-products-and-services.com/);
8.
Students
who successfully complete the Postgraduate Diploma will progress to a
Postgraduate Degree – MA, MBA, MSc - by a 15,000 to 20,000 words supervised dissertation,
the prerequisite for which is course #7 (Research Methodology);
9.
Courses
are delivered in over 30 Cities including Dubai, Kuala Lumpur, Paris, Milan,
Caracas, Manila, Manama, Istanbul, Jakarta;
10.
The
UK Deliveries are usually in Central London and occasionally in Manchester,
Birmingham and Wolverhampton;
11.
Hotel
‘Academies’, Conference and Meeting Rooms are utilised for course delivery
purpose.
The Programme and Course cost does not include living
accommodation. However, delegates are treated with the following:
Ø
Free Continuous snacks throughout
the Event Days;
Ø
Free Hot Lunch on Event Days;
Ø
Free City Tour;
Ø
Free Stationery;
Ø
Free On-site Internet Access;
Ø
HRODC Postgraduate
Training Institute’s Postgraduate
Diploma; or
Ø
Certificate of
Attendance and Participation – if unsuccessful on resit.
HRODC
Postgraduate Training Institute’s Complimentary Products include:
1.
HRODC Postgraduate Training Institute’s Leather Conference Folder;
2.
HRODC Postgraduate Training Institute’s Leather Conference Ring Binder/ Writing Pad;
3.
HRODC Postgraduate Training Institute’s Key Ring/ Chain;
4.
HRODC Postgraduate Training Institute’s Leather Conference (Computer – Phone) Bag – Black or Brown;
5.
HRODC Postgraduate Training Institute’s 8GB USB Flash Memory Drive, with Course/ Programme Material;
6.
HRODC Postgraduate Training Institute’s Metal Pen;
7.
HRODC Postgraduate Training Institute’s Polo Shirt.
**Please see product images, as a separate file
- Complimentary Products For Students, from HRODC Postgraduate Training
Institute**
HRODC Postgraduate Training
Institute’s Global Telephone Numbers
|
||||
You are most welcome to communicate with me,
view our progress or follow us, on:
|
|
Outlook:
|
|
Skype:
|
hrodcltdpgti4
|
Facebook
#1
|
|
Facebook #2:
|
https://www.facebook.com/institute2?fref=ts
|
Facebook #3
|
https://www.facebook.com/groups/CoursesWorldwide/?ref=bookmarks
|
Twitter:
|
|
Linked-In:
|
|
You
Tube:
|
|
Website
#1
|
|
Website
#2
|
|
Website
#3
|
|
Website
#4
|
With Kindest Regards
ProfDr Crawford
Prof
Dr Crawford
Director
No comments:
Post a Comment